A former worker of Wellspring Capital Administration filed a lawsuit in a New York Thursday alleging that the CEO’s son, Christopher Dawson, drugged and repeatedly raped her one night time within the household’s New York condominium.
The lady making the declare is Taylor Lawrence, who labored at Wellspring Capital Administration from 2010-2018 as Head of Advertising and Investor Relations. In response to Lawrence’s grievance, she had by no means met Christopher Dawson earlier than she says he assaulted her on the night time of Dec. 29, 2014.
On the time Dawson was 18-years previous and a pupil at Kenyon School.
Here’s what it’s essential know:
1. Lawrence Say She Went to The Dawsons’ Residence After Being Stood Up By Invoice Dawson & That’s When She Met Christopher
In response to the grievance, Lawrence was supposed to satisfy Wellspring CEO Invoice Dawson at a bar for drinks close to his condominium. He was very late and when she contacted him he mentioned he was tied up ingesting together with his sons.
Ultimately, the CEO stopped replying to her so she walked to his condominium at round 11 pm. The doorman known as as much as the residence and advised her they mentioned she may go to the condominium, which was the one one on the whole flooring.
When she entered the condominium the one individual she noticed was the son, Christopher Dawson, who she’d not met earlier than. He mentioned his dad was sleeping.
2. Lawrence Claims Christopher Dawson Drugged Her & She Was Incapacitated as He Raped Her A number of Instances
The grievance says that the youthful Dawson provided Lawrence a drink, which she accepted whereas she known as a cab and waited. That’s when the grievance alleges he drugged the drink with “a narcotic” with the intention of sexually assaulting Lawrence.
The court docket doc says that as a result of she was drugged, Lawrence was “incapable of lawfully consenting to any sexual exercise.”
Dawson turned pornography on the TV, and Lawrence mentioned she needed to go, in accordance with the grievance. Then, it says, he pulled out his erect penis and mentioned, “You’re not going to go away this. You’re not going anyplace.”
The grievance says Dawson pushed Lawrence to the ground and repeatedly raped her each vaginally and anally.
Lawrence mentioned that when she wakened she was solely carrying a high and was bare from the waist down. She mentioned she was sore and bruised on her “higher thighs, decrease again, buttocks and arms,” in accordance with the lawsuit.
One other brother, William Dawson III was the one who woke her she mentioned and insisted she go away instantly, and that she shouldn’t even be there. Lawrence mentioned she couldn’t discover her purse however Willaim mentioned she wanted to go so she left with out her purse.
3. Lawrence Claims She Informed Invoice Dawson In regards to the Rape However He Mentioned ‘I Will Destroy You. I Will Break You’ if She Stored Pursuing the Accusations
In response to the declare, “Invoice Dawson advised Ms. Lawrence that his son, Christopher Dawson, bragged to him ‘he plugged you within the ass.’ Ms. Lawrence advised Invoice Dawson that it was not consensual.”
Lawrence introduced it up one other time in entrance of a Managing Companion “-that his son had raped her, Invoice Dawson responded by saying: “I’ll destroy you. I’ll smash you,” the grievance says.
However the Dawsons deny ever having heard of the incident till this previous June, though Lawrence labored on the firm for over three years after the alleged rape.
The NY Publish reported the household’s assertion mentioned:
The grievance is pure fiction supposed as a shakedown and we’ll defend aggressively in opposition to it. The alleged occasion — mentioned to have occurred greater than 5 years in the past between a then 18- yr previous boy and a then 34-year previous worker of the agency — by no means occurred. Certainly, the worker, who labored on the agency for greater than three years after the alleged occasion, by no means as soon as talked about it to the Dawsons, anybody in human assets or the police. The primary time we heard something about this was in June, 2020.
4. The Grievance Says That Christopher Dawson ‘Believed’ His Father’s Cash ‘Entitled Him to a Cloak of Immunity’
In response to the grievance:
Defendant Christopher Dawson comes from a background of privilege and wealth – his father is William (“Invoice”) F. Dawson, Jr., the Chief Government Officer of the non-public fairness agency Wellspring Capital Administration LLC (“Wellspring”), and is probably going value effectively in extra of $100 million – which Christopher Dawson believed entitled him to a cloak of immunity wherein he may sexually assault and anally rape Plaintiff Taylor Lawrence, who was on the time an worker of Wellspring.
Lawrence mentioned she is now coming ahead as a result of she doesn’t need Christopher Dawson to proceed to “cover behind his father’s wealth and privilege.” She hopes that the lawsuit will imply he’s held accountable for what she says he did to her, and “to ensure no further girls are victimized by his acts of sexual violence,” in accordance with court docket paperwork.
Christopher Dawson’s LinkedIn web page says he’s the Director at SquareFoot, an actual property firm that finds workplace house for business enterprises. He graduated from Kenyon School with a level in Economics in 2018. Dawson began on the college in 2014, the identical yr he’s accused of raping Lawrence.
5. The Quantity of Cash Lawrence is Suing For Is Not But Established
In response to the lawsuit, Lawrence and her attorneys are suing to “compensate Plaintiff for all relevant damages permitted by regulation… together with compensatory damages, together with, however not restricted to, compensation for Plaintiff’s emotional misery, ache and struggling, together with “bodily harm, ache and struggling, severe psychological and emotional misery, psychological anguish, anxiousness, embarrassment and humiliation.”
The quantity of these damages is to be decided on the trial, in accordance with the grievance.
The NY Publish reported the lawsuit is filed below New York’s Gender-Motivated Violence Act, “which permits sexual assault victims to sue their assailants after the prison statute of limitations expires.”
READ NEXT: Florida Police Company to Use Social Staff to Reply to Non-Violent Calls